Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,672,183 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 14.5 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $66,903, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $53,806, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $118,056, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $57,123, a difference of 0.080%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $69,872, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.9%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.83%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 55.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%).