Crow vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,631,947 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 78.2 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $53,806, a difference of 69.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $118,056, a difference of 65.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $122,222, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,123, a difference of 21.5%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $46,502, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $69,872, a difference of 41.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 129.3%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 108.7%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 44.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 259.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 228.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 225.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 107.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 100.6%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.4%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.2%).