Austrian vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,328,102 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.452% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 451.7 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,339 compared to $115,509, a difference of 26.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $128,723, a difference of 26.4%), and median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $74,224, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $57,740, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $76,686, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.1%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (48.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 10th grade (95.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%).