Choctaw vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,553,711 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $115,509, a difference of 65.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $128,723, a difference of 64.7%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $59,066, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $57,740, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $76,686, a difference of 44.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 102.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 91.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 60.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.42%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 137.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 134.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 112.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 103.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 95.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 78.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.3%).