Finnish vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,038,290 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 91.0 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,607 compared to $115,509, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $128,723, a difference of 36.1%), and per capita income ($43,461 compared to $59,066, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $57,740, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $76,686, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.7%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 38.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 37.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.2%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 89.0%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 81.3%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.14%), high school diploma (91.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%).