Bhutanese vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Filipinos

Exceptional
Exceptional
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,821,903 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 15.8 Filipinos.
Bhutanese Integration in Filipino Communities

Bhutanese vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $74,224, a difference of 20.2%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $59,066, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $128,723, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $57,740, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $76,686, a difference of 6.1%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Income
Income MetricBhutaneseFilipino
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
29.7%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.5%), poverty (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseFilipino
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseFilipino
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.5%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseFilipino
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
23.0%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.9%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.0%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
3.4%

Bhutanese vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Bhutanese vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseFilipino
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%