Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Chickasaw Female Poverty
15.9%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0044% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 38.6% |
| Range | 25.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 18.1% |
| Median | 7.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,640,281 | 15.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,288,168 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,602,311 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,613,631 | 16.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 822,406 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,653 | 14.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,583 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 89,231 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,601 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 13.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 15.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 15.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 18.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 15,581 | 16.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 18.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,441 | 20.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 18.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 15.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 18.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 22.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 24.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 14.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 18.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 20.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,290 | 14.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87% | 2,240 | 16.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 11.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 17.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 18.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 26.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 617 | 15.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 25.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 29.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 29.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 13.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 18.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 17.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 15.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 21.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 14.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 12.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 14.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 15.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 23.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 18.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 18.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 21.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 33.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 20.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 19.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 25.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 16.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 20.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 20.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 5.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 19.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 13.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 12.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 25.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 38.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 22.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 24.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 14.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 13.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 8.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 32.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 12.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 18.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 13.3% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 13.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 19.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 1.9% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 21.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 15.3% |