Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Chickasaw Male Poverty
13.5%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 33.0% |
| Range | 25.7% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 7.3% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,647,910 | 12.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,289,831 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,602,311 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,608,731 | 14.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 821,575 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,840 | 12.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,111 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 14.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 88,684 | 12.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,369 | 15.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 10.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 13.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 15.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 16.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 14,485 | 18.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 17.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,441 | 19.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 15.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 14.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 10.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 11.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 16.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 13.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 18.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 15.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 13.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 2,390 | 14.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 8.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 15.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 9.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 22.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 16.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 20.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 10.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 20.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 16.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 16.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 13.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 22.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 18.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 10.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 15.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 10.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 14.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 2.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 13.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,489 | 18.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 12.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 17.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 25.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 13.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 3.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 22.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 11.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 16.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 33.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 5.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 17.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 12.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 11.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 23.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 33.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 8.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 18.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 11.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 10.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 21.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 13.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 19.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 2.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 11.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 20.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 12.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 22.4% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 7.2% |