Inupiat Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Inupiat Female Poverty
16.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,314,579 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belize (16.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
Inupiat Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 100.0% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 46.5% | 23.7% |
| Median | 40.9% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.8% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 80.3% | 21.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.1% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.8% | 15.5% |
Correlation Details
| Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 94,664,840 | 15.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 427,070 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 320,333 | 14.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 98,568 | 11.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 453,266 | 11.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 170,010 | 13.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 32,479 | 9.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 69,378 | 9.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 9,684 | 14.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 3,070 | 12.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 7,328 | 19.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 983 | 2.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,062 | 37.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 2,858 | 11.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 80 | 8.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 927 | 16.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 584 | 20.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.85% | 452 | 17.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 119 | 66.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.20% | 329 | 5.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 18.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.75% | 16 | 37.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 27.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.51% | 78 | 14.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.47% | 843 | 49.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.26% | 95 | 38.3% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 58.5% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.09% | 89 | 62.5% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.78% | 46 | 25.0% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 54.5% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 10.4% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 16.7% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 9.2% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 8.3% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 12.9% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 13.0% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 11.6% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 8.0% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.28% | 444 | 47.6% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 16.1% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 23.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 31.1% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 35.3% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 48.1% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 21.4% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.95% | 378 | 15.6% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 21.9% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 25.5% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.23% | 266 | 33.3% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.57% | 809 | 12.1% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 47.5% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 32.5% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 18.3% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.08% | 1,072 | 7.3% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 35.3% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 27.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.30% | 824 | 28.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 535 | 41.2% |