Costa Rican Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Costa Rican Female Poverty
13.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0052% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Costa Ricans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Costa Ricans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Costa Rican Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 45.8% |
| Range | 26.8% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 11.8% |
| Median | 3.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.9% |
Correlation Details
| Costa Rican Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 193,586,273 | 15.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 35,423,043 | 13.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 11,344,477 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 4,991,246 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,809,626 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 1,719,023 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 888,608 | 14.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 644,432 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 353,272 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 322,219 | 11.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 218,565 | 9.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 140,157 | 15.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 147,760 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 73,547 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 202,355 | 11.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 90,548 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 38,098 | 13.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 33,293 | 6.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 7,644 | 5.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 45,765 | 13.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 30,438 | 14.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 70,951 | 13.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 40,321 | 6.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 8,266 | 4.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 24,178 | 14.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 12,649 | 5.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 1,273 | 12.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 2,292 | 7.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 21,507 | 8.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 30,866 | 13.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 8,954 | 5.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 786 | 18.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 9,781 | 5.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 9,105 | 12.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 587 | 4.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 3,309 | 5.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 16,602 | 6.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 616 | 15.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.42% | 277 | 8.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 1,519 | 6.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 8,287 | 5.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 5,373 | 21.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 5,226 | 22.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 9,676 | 11.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 915 | 45.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 398 | 12.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 159 | 6.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 14,778 | 9.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 11,906 | 11.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.07% | 1,132 | 5.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 98 | 22.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 4,771 | 28.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 253 | 3.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.88% | 584 | 3.8% |