Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Celtic Female Poverty
13.4%
POVERTY | FEMALES
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,361,831 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 13.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Cameroon (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Ugandan (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Israeli (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Uruguayan (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Albania | 79.2 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 78.8 /100 | #164 | Good 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 78.7 /100 | #165 | Good 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 78.7 /100 | #166 | Good 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 78.6 /100 | #167 | Good 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 78.5 /100 | #168 | Good 13.4% |
| Israelis | 78.5 /100 | #169 | Good 13.4% |
| Celtics | 78.3 /100 | #170 | Good 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 78.3 /100 | #171 | Good 13.4% |
| Ugandans | 78.2 /100 | #172 | Good 13.4% |
| Uruguayans | 78.1 /100 | #173 | Good 13.5% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 78.0 /100 | #174 | Good 13.5% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 77.9 /100 | #175 | Good 13.5% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.9 /100 | #176 | Good 13.5% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 77.8 /100 | #177 | Good 13.5% |
Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 0.10% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 66.6% | 99.9% |
| Mean | 3.8% | 15.6% |
| Median | 2.1% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 13.6% |
Correlation Details
| Celtic Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 145,060,679 | 15.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.094% | 18,038,757 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 5,266,493 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 3,221,984 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,152,837 | 13.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 560,511 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 498,434 | 10.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 186,002 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 205,222 | 10.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 237,270 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 242,239 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 111,349 | 17.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 87,117 | 11.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 52,212 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 30,610 | 24.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 29,285 | 7.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 55,005 | 13.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 42,333 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 16,695 | 12.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 25,953 | 10.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 15,265 | 15.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 10,406 | 18.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 27,101 | 20.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 12,289 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 11,348 | 10.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 3,567 | 12.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 8,688 | 9.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 5,060 | 9.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 25,569 | 20.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 717 | 14.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 4,971 | 12.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 14,625 | 7.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 9,180 | 9.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 6,274 | 5.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 5,242 | 18.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 726 | 4.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 23,451 | 25.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 2,615 | 3.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 818 | 19.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 7,098 | 10.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 110 | 7.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 6,887 | 20.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 3,457 | 5.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04% | 9,164 | 17.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 4,045 | 7.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 2,159 | 12.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 243 | 7.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 1,980 | 16.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 103 | 42.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 3,726 | 0.10% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 1,668 | 22.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 112 | 11.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 7,370 | 18.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 236 | 51.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30% | 1,152 | 26.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 70 | 10.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 252 | 8.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 455 | 22.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.10% | 2,549 | 10.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.33% | 15 | 25.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 78 | 4.9% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.67% | 3 | 100.0% |