Chickasaw vs Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iroquois
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Iroquois
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 0.26%.
![Chickasaw vs Iroquois Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/chickasaw-vs-iroquois-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.7% | 95.3% |
Mean | 18.1% | 22.4% |
Median | 17.3% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |