Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 32.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 31.2% |
| Range | 36.7% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 11.5% |
| Median | 17.3% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |