Chickasaw vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Argentineans
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 24.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 23.9% |
| Range | 36.7% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 10.5% |
| Median | 17.3% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |