Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
19.5%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.50% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 68.8% |
| Range | 25.7% | 63.7% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 24.3% |
| Median | 7.0% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 10.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,511,357 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,237,806 | 16.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,570,981 | 17.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,580,358 | 21.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 819,926 | 20.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 459,569 | 18.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 229,116 | 20.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 247,665 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 77,818 | 17.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 87,534 | 22.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 52,228 | 15.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 19.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 53,444 | 21.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 23.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 13,199 | 23.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 20.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,243 | 25.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,996 | 27.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 19.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 23.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,618 | 23.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 26.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 17.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 27.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 19.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,290 | 25.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,159 | 16.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 2,482 | 25.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,771 | 18.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,670 | 15.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,135 | 35.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 18.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 24.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 28.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 20.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 668 | 45.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 24.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 33.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 28.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 15.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 18.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 15.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 24.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 36.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.95% | 1,296 | 33.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 18.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 27.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 39.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 19.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 24.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 20.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 15.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 37.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 36.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 5.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 25.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 17.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 18.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 37.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 48.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 5.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 27.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 17.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 30.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 28.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 68.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 9.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 42.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 18.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 52.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 6.3% |