Blackfeet Female Poverty
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Blackfeet Female Poverty
16.4%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,450,114 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 16.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Blackfeet and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Blackfeet influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Blackfeet simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Blackfeet Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.088% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 72.4% |
| Range | 99.9% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 24.1% |
| Median | 13.7% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.6% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.3% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.7% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.4% | 15.2% |
Correlation Details
| Blackfeet Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.088% | 300,749,719 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 6,538,581 | 15.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 986,055 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 680,829 | 18.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 216,302 | 17.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 75,982 | 17.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 46,239 | 21.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 28,443 | 17.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 32,740 | 17.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 8,304 | 20.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 8,151 | 25.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 14,414 | 18.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 9,647 | 17.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.64% | 5,107 | 11.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.26% | 4,213 | 18.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 3,965 | 15.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.39% | 3,038 | 37.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 1,901 | 18.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.01% | 322 | 20.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 1,326 | 25.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 853 | 61.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 2,538 | 19.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 147 | 55.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 1,240 | 26.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 197 | 3.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.72% | 860 | 13.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 167 | 72.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.58% | 240 | 8.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.28% | 1,253 | 12.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 534 | 6.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 3,061 | 30.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.83% | 116 | 6.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.83% | 48 | 8.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.98% | 5,008 | 29.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.73% | 354 | 15.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.88% | 414 | 22.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.15% | 163 | 5.2% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.07% | 343 | 24.4% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.61% | 244 | 28.2% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.78% | 1,317 | 20.2% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.90% | 863 | 5.2% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.67% | 15 | 20.0% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.23% | 271 | 4.6% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.35% | 1,654 | 44.9% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.09% | 7,532 | 36.7% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.65% | 871 | 40.5% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.34% | 3,001 | 38.8% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.96% | 229 | 52.2% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.43% | 690 | 37.5% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.78% | 554 | 46.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 59 | 43.6% |