Chickasaw vs Vietnamese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Vietnamese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Vietnamese
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Vietnamese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,651,264 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Vietnamese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 39.9% |
| Range | 36.7% | 38.7% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 14.9% |
| Median | 17.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Vietnamese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |