Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belize Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Belize
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Belize
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belize Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,293,638 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Belize |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 35.2% |
| Range | 36.7% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 17.0% |
| Median | 17.3% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belize by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Inupiat (16.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.55%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.63%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |