Immigrants from Turkey Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Turkey Female Poverty
12.6%
POVERTY | FEMALES
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,623 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 12.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.7% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Turkey influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Turkey simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants from Turkey Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.075% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 37.0% |
| Range | 9.7% | 33.3% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 11.6% |
| Median | 3.0% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Turkey Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 205,757,224 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 12,820,693 | 11.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 2,356,216 | 9.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 866,402 | 8.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 303,229 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 335,068 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 296,969 | 9.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 63,506 | 12.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 44,835 | 13.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 32,612 | 5.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 7,619 | 3.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 10,650 | 4.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 17,240 | 12.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 2,384 | 8.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 2,440 | 5.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 5,798 | 4.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 11,458 | 22.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 5,476 | 11.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 702 | 18.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 102 | 37.0% |