Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
24.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,361,358 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022 and weighted average of 24.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (24.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch West Indian (24.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (24.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Congo (24.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Black/African American (24.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 25.2% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 25.3% |
Chickasaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 57.4% |
| Range | 25.7% | 54.1% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 26.8% |
| Median | 6.2% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 32.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 10.5% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,085,533 | 22.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,978,103 | 22.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,468,890 | 22.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,528,751 | 24.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 796,347 | 33.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 424,732 | 20.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 214,201 | 20.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 227,177 | 27.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 81,568 | 21.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 75,673 | 27.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 50,404 | 17.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 32,347 | 21.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 43,943 | 25.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 10,872 | 20.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 11,432 | 24.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 58,284 | 32.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 17,405 | 36.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,553 | 16.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 17.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 5,046 | 52.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 890 | 48.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 25.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 4,476 | 13.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 16.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 29.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 3,001 | 25.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 1,997 | 25.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,833 | 36.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 26.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 3,476 | 31.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,852 | 18.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 617 | 57.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 24.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 22.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.96% | 3,705 | 28.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 36.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 23.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 759 | 48.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 37.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 27.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 16.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 47.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 16.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 5.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 560 | 21.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 3.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 17.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 33.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 31.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 41.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 25.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 4,739 | 26.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 16.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 8.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 39.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 31.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 33.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 40.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 28.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 28.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 18.2% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 18.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 31.9% |