Central American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Central American Indian Female Poverty
18.0%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,040,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 18.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.0% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Central American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.074% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 94.5% |
| Range | 39.4% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 9.8% | 26.1% |
| Median | 6.3% | 20.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 17.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 17.3% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.074% | 190,790,506 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 68,647,316 | 15.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 37,005,171 | 16.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 12,513,014 | 18.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,720,862 | 17.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 3,818,313 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,158,586 | 18.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 1,087,298 | 21.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 856,150 | 15.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 969,538 | 18.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 658,067 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 268,785 | 24.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 290,773 | 19.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 132,871 | 13.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 176,610 | 15.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 88,661 | 13.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 90,343 | 20.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 64,780 | 17.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 106,000 | 33.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 75,918 | 23.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 65,761 | 22.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 29,327 | 8.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 43,517 | 12.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 13,457 | 15.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 6,941 | 20.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 37,203 | 23.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 16,960 | 14.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 39,457 | 38.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 13,719 | 14.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.90% | 7,444 | 27.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 4,136 | 6.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 12,901 | 29.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 3,860 | 13.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 14,201 | 13.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 20,869 | 33.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 7,792 | 46.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 507 | 6.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38% | 2,619 | 32.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 39,406 | 44.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 3,807 | 14.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 1,366 | 13.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 721 | 2.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 284 | 20.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.55% | 1,099 | 17.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 5,462 | 2.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 759 | 27.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 2,663 | 36.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 795 | 35.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 958 | 9.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 1,181 | 76.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 1,324 | 41.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 736 | 42.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.59% | 11,179 | 43.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.07% | 587 | 10.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 5,024 | 20.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,386 | 41.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 141 | 6.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 1,396 | 33.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 159 | 1.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.51% | 1,438 | 2.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.70% | 363 | 33.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.95% | 655 | 2.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92% | 872 | 37.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.01% | 1,130 | 34.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 3,233 | 47.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.54% | 2,190 | 49.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.16% | 2,658 | 51.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.78% | 1,632 | 53.6% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.95% | 25,542 | 45.7% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.46% | 4,562 | 38.4% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.32% | 362 | 94.5% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.40% | 1,488 | 54.4% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.88% | 37,642 | 48.9% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.48% | 15,304 | 42.2% |