Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty
13.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES
71.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,754,712 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 13.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.7% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Fiji influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Fiji simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.020% | 8.9% |
| Maximum | 3.6% | 21.1% |
| Range | 3.6% | 12.2% |
| Mean | 1.1% | 13.7% |
| Median | 1.1% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.54% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 3.7% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Fiji Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 73,451,045 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 9,801,783 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 3,283,370 | 11.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 1,978,289 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 1,496,956 | 11.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 213,806 | 14.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 532,515 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 650,145 | 13.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 381,498 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 174,607 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 116,498 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 280,429 | 12.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 609,305 | 15.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 14,291 | 16.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 199,405 | 9.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 110,572 | 10.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 85,410 | 20.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 84,197 | 15.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 77,712 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 8,920 | 13.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 5,411 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 60,850 | 16.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 41,599 | 21.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 96,099 | 21.0% |