Immigrants from Yemen Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Yemen
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Yemen Female Poverty
22.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Yemen Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,433,611 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 22.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Yemen within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.80% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Yemen and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Yemen influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Yemen simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Yemen by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Yemen are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 3.2%), Pima (23.6%, a difference of 3.3%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |
Immigrants from Yemen Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Yemen Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 22.0% | 45.4% |
| Range | 21.9% | 42.6% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 23.0% |
| Median | 2.3% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 10.7% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Yemen Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 52,178,584 | 16.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 17,218,052 | 16.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 4,583,174 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 2,107,407 | 17.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 1,744,676 | 19.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 1,571,858 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 507,712 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 280,364 | 14.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 897,069 | 28.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 228,654 | 19.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 77,809 | 24.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 127,787 | 29.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 49,141 | 30.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 66,881 | 26.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 702 | 9.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 17,992 | 17.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 78,750 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 83,652 | 28.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 8,765 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 20,503 | 34.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 78,932 | 23.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 12,771 | 25.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 23,565 | 10.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 16,896 | 34.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 42,548 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,596 | 25.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 4,716 | 13.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 8,284 | 31.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 397 | 2.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 1,889 | 45.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27% | 1,837 | 44.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.31% | 2,630 | 28.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 24,990 | 18.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 2,487 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 20,936 | 20.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 19,762 | 22.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.60% | 26,547 | 39.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.91% | 1,303 | 15.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 25,278 | 33.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.88% | 13,704 | 23.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 778 | 15.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.78% | 1,967 | 5.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 108,414 | 24.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 1,132 | 11.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.90% | 1,546 | 7.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 630 | 32.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 53,044 | 35.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.03% | 43,213 | 38.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.25% | 27,842 | 39.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.05% | 8,919 | 32.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.97% | 5,526 | 44.7% |