Sioux Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,087,584 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 20.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.53% in poverty level among females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sioux and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sioux influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Sioux simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 19.2%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants from Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 19.3%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 20.0%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 20.2%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 20.7%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 20.8%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 20.9%
Hopi	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 21.0%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 21.5%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 22.1%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 22.8%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 23.5%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 23.6%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 23.9%

Sioux Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sioux Data	Female Poverty Data
Minimum	0.069%	3.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	99.9%	96.5%
Mean	43.6%	34.8%
Median	40.7%	26.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.4%	15.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	70.2%	48.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	53.7%	33.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	30.2%	24.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	30.1%	24.4%

Correlation Details

Sioux Percentile	Sample Size	Female Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.069%	226,342,059	14.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68%	4,520,466	13.9%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23%	1,031,896	13.8%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71%	476,025	14.3%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18%	603,151	12.6%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73%	179,793	14.8%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27%	162,082	16.5%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72%	80,331	14.8%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29%	97,219	10.2%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59%	46,923	12.9%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.30%	24,417	11.0%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.81%	21,444	11.3%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.38%	43,211	18.9%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74%	33,554	19.0%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29%	6,337	19.4%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.79%	4,401	19.9%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	4,165	16.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87%	20,974	16.9%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20%	12,809	16.9%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.85%	38,801	15.4%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26%	3,420	25.8%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52%	75,762	15.4%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30%	26,681	13.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.74%	2,939	19.4%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23%	7,277	15.1%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.75%	11,918	26.7%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11%	1,205	15.2%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.89%	3,601	16.2%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.16%	932	40.4%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.79%	47,142	22.0%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38%	5,721	21.7%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81%	7,679	21.8%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.22%	561	12.5%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.61%	313	3.5%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.42%	6,057	18.7%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.75%	1,014	29.6%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.15%	3,268	22.6%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.72%	406	20.6%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.23%	52	54.5%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.62%	4,199	16.4%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.30%	739	16.8%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.64%	5,529	11.7%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.27%	1,763	10.8%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.54%	65	25.9%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25%	3,735	14.1%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.69%	1,441	14.6%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.22%	715	17.1%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.71%	97	38.8%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74%	5,437	19.5%
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.31%	976	27.5%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.87%	688	15.1%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.37%	1,547	15.4%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.74%	2,315	19.0%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.94%	1,479	91.5%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.42%	503	20.5%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.71%	414	29.0%
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.15%	534	14.7%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.20%	484	16.5%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.58%	95	16.3%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.73%	440	8.2%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33%	75	10.9%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.18%	1,021	97.1%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.85%	858	12.2%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.20%	125	18.6%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.54%	1,210	17.9%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.31%	67	73.5%
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.74%	842	15.7%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.63%	627	17.5%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.16%	1,155	9.7%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.65%	272	10.0%
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.40%	106	94.0%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.61%	876	47.5%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.17%	1,621	12.2%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.50%	286	84.2%
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.15%	2,195	35.4%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.83%	3,410	15.7%
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.25%	228	70.4%
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.75%	681	33.0%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.30%	3,509	27.6%
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.36%	2,921	46.3%
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.74%	1,346	42.6%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.90%	395	29.5%
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.99%	1,504	49.7%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.24%	59	40.0%
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.13%	5,389	28.4%
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.50%	218	12.9%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.14%	6,596	35.8%
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.21%	3,905	48.1%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.58%	574	31.8%
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.20%	912	27.1%
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.48%	283	69.7%
[ 62.0% - 62.5% ] 62.10%	926	52.7%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.12%	526	13.5%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.38%	146	49.2%
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.24%	1,168	48.7%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.30%	362	7.1%
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75%	2,505	55.7%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.99%	2,009	40.2%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23%	3,516	45.0%
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.90%	1,256	57.1%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.42%	896	54.0%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.93%	626	40.8%
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.62%	229	77.8%
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.72%	766	59.6%
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.78%	1,812	37.3%
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.64%	2,274	44.3%
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.79%	280	66.7%
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.10%	262	35.2%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.87%	470	31.2%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.26%	233	65.9%
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.47%	3,629	60.2%
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.33%	144	28.6%
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.79%	7,820	37.9%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.39%	410	62.6%
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30%	2,572	56.5%
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.75%	2,204	41.7%
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.77%	3,484	60.1%
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.50%	176	16.2%
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.67%	681	100.0%
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.38%	1,041	68.7%
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.92%	343	95.7%
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30%	355	95.8%
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.54%	1,443	48.3%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.34%	1,087	39.0%
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.85%	1,903	45.9%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.30%	844	48.5%
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.47%	1,256	40.4%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.44%	593	82.6%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.40%	500	75.2%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.83%	1,042	36.2%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.27%	183	96.7%
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.86%	841	80.0%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	2,304	83.9%

Sioux Female Poverty

COMPARE

Sioux Female PovertyTragic

Sioux Female Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Sioux by Female Poverty

Sioux Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Sioux Female Poverty
Tragic