Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT | 30 TO 34 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,410 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 6.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), American (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Seminole (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.1% |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.1% |
Haitians | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants from Central America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.2% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.3% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.3% |
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Data |
Minimum | 0.031% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 25.7% | 60.0% |
Range | 25.7% | 57.4% |
Mean | 6.8% | 11.1% |
Median | 5.1% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 11.4% |
Correlation Details
Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.031% | 134,104,673 | 5.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,595,668 | 5.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,176,589 | 6.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,432,297 | 5.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 734,419 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 409,808 | 5.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 188,236 | 6.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 181,909 | 6.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 75,992 | 5.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 53,921 | 7.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 16,974 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 16,254 | 5.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 30,066 | 9.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,290 | 10.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 6,271 | 8.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 53,801 | 7.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 8,693 | 13.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,373 | 7.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 1,321 | 2.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 363 | 5.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 548 | 33.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 656 | 15.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 2,089 | 8.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 18,972 | 15.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 24,784 | 11.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 1,611 | 4.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 2,868 | 8.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 36,324 | 9.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 2,744 | 9.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.37% | 1,726 | 3.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 8.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.82% | 425 | 6.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 668 | 16.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 5.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 1,123 | 4.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 2,061 | 8.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 6.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 4.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.98% | 323 | 6.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 4.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,821 | 6.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 18.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 6,707 | 5.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.97% | 2,197 | 9.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 7.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 6.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 6.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 6,714 | 8.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 9.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 25.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 33.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 60.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 60.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 14.7% |