Yup'ik Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Yup'ik Female Poverty
21.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,953,157 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 21.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yup'ik and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yup'ik influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Yup'ik simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 3.0%), Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |
Yup'ik Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik Data | Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 78.3% |
Mean | 51.1% | 23.8% |
Median | 61.0% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 32.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 74.7% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.0% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.7% | 15.4% |
Correlation Details
Yup'ik Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 38,685,484 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 261,223 | 10.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 182,688 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 92,710 | 10.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 95,408 | 12.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 57,157 | 11.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 320,963 | 10.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 24,258 | 11.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 27,064 | 12.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 30,662 | 6.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 59,649 | 13.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 3,018 | 11.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 38,793 | 21.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 1,588 | 20.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.88% | 439 | 12.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 1,707 | 10.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 2,027 | 8.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.49% | 383 | 1.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 51 | 54.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 41 | 33.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 836 | 10.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.84% | 95 | 12.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 90 | 13.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 450 | 5.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.96% | 235 | 17.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 630 | 16.1% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 864 | 58.9% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.98% | 1,768 | 53.4% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.30% | 1,602 | 32.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.78% | 92 | 6.5% |
[ 60.0% - 60.5% ] 60.14% | 715 | 14.1% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.74% | 2,175 | 14.5% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.34% | 551 | 9.2% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.45% | 2,577 | 15.1% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.78% | 900 | 28.0% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.12% | 6,312 | 13.4% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.36% | 830 | 33.6% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.84% | 8,157 | 19.5% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.89% | 760 | 38.7% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.15% | 596 | 26.7% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.79% | 1,442 | 24.1% |
[ 76.0% - 76.5% ] 76.04% | 1,828 | 26.7% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.99% | 843 | 49.5% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.27% | 2,316 | 32.7% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.92% | 4,184 | 32.3% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.82% | 146 | 32.4% |
[ 81.0% - 81.5% ] 81.19% | 1,308 | 23.7% |
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.77% | 616 | 18.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.63% | 5,358 | 21.9% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.29% | 992 | 28.2% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.91% | 3,389 | 30.9% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.11% | 190 | 19.9% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.76% | 4,614 | 33.0% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.49% | 614 | 52.1% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.59% | 234 | 18.0% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.53% | 950 | 29.4% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.40% | 3,128 | 43.3% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.59% | 1,178 | 14.8% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.20% | 2,209 | 40.7% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.77% | 62 | 80.0% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.43% | 778 | 42.3% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.67% | 430 | 38.1% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.43% | 353 | 14.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 447 | 41.4% |