Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,462,695 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 3.3%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 80.6% |
Range | 36.7% | 80.3% |
Mean | 18.1% | 14.7% |
Median | 17.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.84%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |