Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
4.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT | SENIORS > 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,802,460 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 4.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.39% in unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Congo (4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), Tsimshian (4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Indonesian (4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 28.2% |
| Range | 15.3% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.2% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 131,155,241 | 4.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,816,729 | 4.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 941,476 | 4.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,359,886 | 2.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 703,645 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 280,583 | 3.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 64,153 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 175,328 | 3.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 43,063 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 51,998 | 3.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 23,541 | 4.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 15,038 | 7.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 15,728 | 9.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 11,290 | 8.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 1,175 | 15.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 45,410 | 3.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 2,337 | 1.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 1,048 | 1.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.96% | 1,264 | 3.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 1,725 | 13.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 15,358 | 1.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 24,784 | 1.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 1,513 | 28.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,388 | 0.87% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.39% | 4,613 | 21.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 2,020 | 5.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.19% | 2,335 | 13.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 5.4% |