Romanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Romanian Female Poverty
12.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,651,231 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.80% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Romanians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Romanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Romanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Romanian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 27.7% | 59.5% |
| Range | 27.6% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 17.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 14.0% |
Correlation Details
| Romanian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 284,455,312 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 62,603,985 | 12.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 15,555,590 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 7,454,355 | 10.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 3,338,203 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 1,438,587 | 10.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 925,212 | 10.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 580,341 | 10.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 341,109 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 297,832 | 16.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 216,292 | 14.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 35,439 | 7.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 119,541 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 85,468 | 23.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 64,813 | 13.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 65,774 | 28.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 7,028 | 12.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 3,285 | 12.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.91% | 3,546 | 19.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 6,313 | 9.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 2,991 | 6.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 18,136 | 8.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.97% | 4,839 | 22.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 129 | 35.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.57% | 4,903 | 11.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 3,858 | 45.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 214 | 9.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 164 | 5.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 13 | 14.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 326 | 13.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.30% | 1,990 | 11.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.92% | 3,053 | 9.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 659 | 20.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64% | 141 | 32.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 5,501 | 59.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.74% | 426 | 10.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 1.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 40 | 56.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 247 | 7.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.75% | 278 | 28.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 783 | 27.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.18% | 962 | 57.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.70% | 1,668 | 5.2% |