Arab Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Arab Female Poverty
13.7%
POVERTY | FEMALES
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,246,115 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 13.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.43% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants from South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants from Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Arab Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 64.1% | 51.5% |
| Range | 63.9% | 50.2% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 18.5% |
| Median | 12.3% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 11.8% |
Correlation Details
| Arab Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 197,234,626 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 128,100,709 | 13.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 73,903,370 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 39,487,163 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,900,611 | 12.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 11,171,904 | 11.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,867,889 | 12.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,306,940 | 10.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 2,099,694 | 10.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,135,529 | 13.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 940,674 | 10.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 828,792 | 9.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 680,630 | 11.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 439,001 | 10.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 219,684 | 13.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 414,818 | 10.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 279,906 | 9.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 138,321 | 15.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 281,970 | 18.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 198,684 | 13.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 84,138 | 10.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 322,832 | 12.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 30,824 | 35.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 86,980 | 9.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.17% | 52,283 | 6.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 97,110 | 12.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 127,955 | 13.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 145,544 | 19.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 47,159 | 17.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.14% | 51,471 | 11.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,414 | 25.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 122 | 25.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.53% | 37,753 | 6.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,809 | 15.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 1,215 | 11.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.46% | 332 | 51.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 156 | 23.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.89% | 686 | 15.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 11.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 11.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,511 | 32.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 10.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40% | 886 | 36.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 7.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.02% | 8,551 | 10.8% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.62% | 160 | 31.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 51 | 13.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 2.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 38.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 49.5% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,842 | 39.9% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 14.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,474 | 23.4% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 44.7% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 1.3% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 24.7% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 22.6% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.01% | 117 | 45.6% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 32.4% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 35.0% |