Chickasaw vs Ugandan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ugandan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Ugandans
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,995,237 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 13.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 30.6% |
| Range | 36.7% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 13.6% |
| Median | 17.3% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |