Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
10.7%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
| Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
| Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
| Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |
Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 26.4% |
| Range | 25.7% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 11.9% |
| Median | 7.0% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,490,637 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,206,256 | 9.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,600,943 | 10.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,612,336 | 9.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 819,489 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 473,102 | 8.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 231,793 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 247,382 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 86,890 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,142 | 10.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 52,484 | 9.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 45,758 | 9.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 54,673 | 12.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 12.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 16,025 | 13.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,027 | 16.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,307 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 9.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 9.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 10.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 12.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 26.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 14.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 14.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 13.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,290 | 13.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 1,611 | 12.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 8.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 11.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,419 | 11.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,186 | 14.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 3.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 21.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 18.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 10.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 4,076 | 10.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.06% | 694 | 7.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 12.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 10.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 11.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 13.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 7.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 2.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 6.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 20.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,533 | 15.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 3.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 13.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 20.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 11.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 10.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 9.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 9.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 16.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 9.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 8.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 7.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 695 | 8.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 13.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 17.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 17.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 15.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 10.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 5.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 24.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 10.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 8.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 14.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 14.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 14.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 7.8% |