Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
19.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |
Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.029% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 16.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 16.8% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 31.9% |
| Median | 4.4% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 19.3% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.029% | 123,601,601 | 14.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,610,374 | 18.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,027,688 | 19.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,424,055 | 19.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 654,701 | 23.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 389,333 | 17.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 183,011 | 18.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 165,150 | 18.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 33,708 | 26.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 54,336 | 33.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 34,712 | 19.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 22,313 | 18.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 23,862 | 24.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 5,988 | 29.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 5,422 | 37.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 49,140 | 37.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 16,739 | 28.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 13,776 | 32.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 1,321 | 31.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.59% | 1,254 | 53.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 548 | 37.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.91% | 1,509 | 34.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.17% | 2,206 | 53.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 17,307 | 16.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 25,953 | 16.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 949 | 55.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 1,611 | 50.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.09% | 1,276 | 73.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 20.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 1,635 | 28.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 4,773 | 38.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 14.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 3,148 | 37.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 759 | 10.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 1,123 | 22.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 15.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 23.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,821 | 20.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 1,445 | 44.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 28.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 18.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 15.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 41.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 48.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 22.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 22.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 100.0% |