Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Yugoslavian Female Poverty
13.1%
POVERTY | FEMALES
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yugoslavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Yugoslavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.060% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 30.2% |
| Range | 26.3% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 12.4% |
| Median | 5.3% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Yugoslavian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.060% | 238,999,849 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 27,844,542 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 8,626,480 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 3,566,143 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 2,193,087 | 11.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,090,696 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 751,260 | 14.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 391,529 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 387,403 | 12.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 372,934 | 13.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 269,208 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 195,748 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 116,196 | 11.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 164,492 | 12.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 44,053 | 4.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 28,373 | 11.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 51,012 | 7.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 84,293 | 11.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 5,070 | 14.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 8,180 | 14.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 11,563 | 8.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 32,167 | 7.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 12,036 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 5,951 | 13.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 10,264 | 3.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 71,165 | 9.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 22,286 | 9.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 1,508 | 15.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 72 | 11.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 950 | 11.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 64,994 | 30.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 705 | 15.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 19,922 | 6.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.58% | 3,665 | 12.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 1,022 | 17.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 16,211 | 21.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 4,947 | 14.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 4,873 | 3.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.53% | 332 | 11.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 29,089 | 9.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 36,359 | 14.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 622 | 10.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 40,152 | 28.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 56 | 20.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 2,280 | 14.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.40% | 846 | 23.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.55% | 502 | 18.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.80% | 881 | 14.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.51% | 74 | 4.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.48% | 3,812 | 13.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.44% | 136 | 4.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.59% | 102 | 2.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.35% | 1,875 | 12.0% |