Alsatian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Alsatian Female Poverty
14.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,678,421 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 14.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.22% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Alsatians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Alsatians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Alsatians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
Alsatian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.016% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 23.1% |
| Range | 31.0% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 11.5% |
| Median | 1.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.79% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Alsatian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.016% | 81,406,856 | 15.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 928,029 | 13.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 110,747 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 119,006 | 8.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 32,091 | 10.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 40,815 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,784 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 262 | 4.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 4,208 | 9.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 2,792 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 5,440 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 1,604 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 1,017 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,573 | 9.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 243 | 23.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,321 | 9.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 827 | 12.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 1,848 | 19.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 707 | 3.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,994 | 13.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 9,202 | 7.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.25% | 723 | 4.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.02% | 332 | 8.0% |