Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty
12.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,909 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 12.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tlingit-Haida influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Tlingit-Haida simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.036% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 76.8% | 32.4% |
| Range | 76.8% | 29.1% |
| Mean | 19.5% | 14.0% |
| Median | 10.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.0% | 7.3% |
Correlation Details
| Tlingit-Haida Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.036% | 59,016,735 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,312,339 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 247,818 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 85,687 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 25,685 | 15.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 8,447 | 8.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 3,655 | 17.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 6,231 | 5.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 10,326 | 10.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.97% | 1,964 | 8.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 822 | 17.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 420 | 21.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 1,762 | 3.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 177 | 10.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.91% | 564 | 5.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,146 | 4.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.80% | 1,257 | 30.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 146 | 32.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 9.00% | 6,691 | 5.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 2,902 | 12.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 29,933 | 6.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 32,108 | 6.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 13,913 | 10.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 18,041 | 10.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 8,168 | 14.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.26% | 2,169 | 11.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.92% | 1,727 | 18.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 4,267 | 11.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.55% | 1,073 | 14.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.53% | 85 | 14.3% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.96% | 1,128 | 6.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.09% | 57 | 20.7% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.59% | 82 | 31.6% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.78% | 920 | 14.2% |
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.33% | 1,792 | 8.2% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.24% | 804 | 17.6% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.59% | 361 | 21.6% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.41% | 1,602 | 19.4% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.63% | 67 | 10.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.85% | 838 | 26.4% |