Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Czechoslovakian Female Poverty
12.4%
POVERTY | FEMALES
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.0013% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Czechoslovakian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 32.3% |
| Range | 35.4% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 13.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,679,598 | 13.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,348,174 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,510,796 | 10.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,014,984 | 10.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 717,144 | 10.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 484,059 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 244,857 | 10.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 131,972 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 49,844 | 10.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 37,988 | 13.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 52,958 | 10.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 32,568 | 15.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 20,530 | 8.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 27,803 | 8.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 22,393 | 8.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,788 | 14.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,207 | 11.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 9,994 | 20.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,498 | 13.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 12.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,719 | 10.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 3,785 | 12.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 3,589 | 10.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,984 | 23.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 23.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,577 | 18.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,864 | 4.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 1,190 | 8.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 25.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 19.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 16.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,786 | 2.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 11.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 22.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 12.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 29.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 25.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 810 | 2.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 23.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 1.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 28.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 14.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,108 | 0.70% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 17.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 13.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 161 | 20.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 0.52% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 1,243 | 22.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 16.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 32.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 17.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 0.77% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 1.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 8.2% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 14.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 19.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 3.4% |