Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Poverty
Chickasaw Poverty
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.0083% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 35.7% |
| Range | 25.7% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 16.2% |
| Median | 7.4% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,647,910 | 14.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,290,497 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,602,311 | 13.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,614,409 | 15.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 822,648 | 16.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,840 | 13.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,583 | 14.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 15.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 89,231 | 13.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,601 | 16.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 11.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 14.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 15.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 17.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 16,025 | 16.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 17.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,441 | 20.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 16.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 14.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 14.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 16.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 19.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 14.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 18.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 17.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 14.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,552 | 13.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 9.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 16.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 13.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 24.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 617 | 13.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 23.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 20.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 25.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 14.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 17.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 15.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 18.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 19.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 12.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 13.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 13.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 14.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 0.99% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 18.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 16.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 15.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 19.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 30.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 17.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 12.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 24.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 14.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 18.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 26.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 5.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 18.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 12.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 12.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 22.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 35.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 15.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 21.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 12.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 12.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 6.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 25.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 13.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 18.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 7.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 12.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 19.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 6.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 22.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 11.4% |