Chickasaw vs Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Shoshone
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Shoshone
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,611,766 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 8.0% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 36.8% |
| Range | 36.7% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Median | 17.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |