Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
12.6%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
78.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,496,800 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 12.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colombian (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Crow (12.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Africa (12.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Moroccan (12.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Aleuts | 79.1 /100 | #210 | Good 12.4% |
| South Americans | 79.0 /100 | #211 | Good 12.4% |
| Laotians | 78.9 /100 | #212 | Good 12.4% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 78.8 /100 | #213 | Good 12.5% |
| Moroccans | 78.6 /100 | #214 | Good 12.5% |
| Hawaiians | 78.4 /100 | #215 | Good 12.6% |
| Colombians | 78.4 /100 | #216 | Good 12.6% |
| Chickasaw | 78.4 /100 | #217 | Good 12.6% |
| Crow | 78.3 /100 | #218 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 78.2 /100 | #219 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 78.1 /100 | #220 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 78.1 /100 | #221 | Good 12.7% |
| Salvadorans | 78.0 /100 | #222 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants from South America | 77.9 /100 | #223 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | 77.8 /100 | #224 | Good 12.7% |
Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.033% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 32.8% | 27.3% |
| Range | 32.8% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 14.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.033% | 132,768,143 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 5,966,077 | 10.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 1,982,726 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 1,582,669 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 591,774 | 11.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 518,812 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 214,796 | 14.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 149,379 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 73,076 | 14.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 92,224 | 12.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 42,909 | 13.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 58,683 | 8.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 22,363 | 15.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 27,273 | 14.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 40,140 | 14.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 32,078 | 15.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 6,971 | 12.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 26,263 | 13.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 8,767 | 12.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.63% | 40,892 | 11.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 9,325 | 14.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 26,236 | 16.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 2,402 | 12.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.37% | 10,111 | 21.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 11,895 | 17.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 4,338 | 13.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 3,319 | 16.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 40,050 | 13.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.39% | 2,225 | 19.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 1,598 | 13.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 4,105 | 18.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 5,948 | 18.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.07% | 1,778 | 24.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 1,324 | 6.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 7,667 | 14.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 2,530 | 20.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 2,516 | 27.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 832 | 6.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 3,292 | 6.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 430 | 17.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 4,061 | 14.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 5,472 | 14.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.71% | 2,043 | 16.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 7,713 | 12.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.24% | 303 | 10.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 13,679 | 11.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.82% | 764 | 13.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 284 | 11.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.61% | 490 | 7.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.83% | 1,062 | 17.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.98% | 1,348 | 11.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 2,654 | 14.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,321 | 7.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 3,184 | 26.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.81% | 3,743 | 9.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.03% | 1,438 | 10.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.38% | 16,990 | 19.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.04% | 35,438 | 15.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.95% | 258 | 26.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 42 | 5.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.67% | 600 | 15.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.32% | 770 | 21.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 760 | 13.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61% | 1,057 | 20.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.92% | 735 | 10.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 434 | 27.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 78 | 12.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.12% | 425 | 18.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.85% | 211 | 16.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.71% | 152 | 10.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.00% | 200 | 16.7% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.81% | 1,155 | 17.2% |