Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.1% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Immigrants from Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
| Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.031% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 23.8% | 94.4% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 53.6% |
| Median | 6.4% | 47.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 34.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 70.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 36.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 25.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 25.3% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.031% | 133,883,205 | 33.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,635,490 | 30.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 1,331,721 | 36.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,449,647 | 37.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 766,377 | 29.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 414,111 | 37.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 205,705 | 34.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 219,694 | 33.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 52,233 | 45.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 75,996 | 38.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 50,244 | 39.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 32,377 | 53.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 36,817 | 26.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 9,202 | 54.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 8,581 | 51.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 55,583 | 35.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 16,739 | 44.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 13,926 | 61.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 39.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 3,441 | 33.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 810 | 87.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,672 | 72.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 3,990 | 35.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 17,307 | 60.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 25,953 | 56.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,402 | 70.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 1,997 | 34.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,833 | 32.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 48.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 3,207 | 40.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 3,302 | 47.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 66.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 450 | 60.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.98% | 3,280 | 31.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 254 | 50.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 12.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 81.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 1,123 | 25.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 38.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 27.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 69.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 25.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.98% | 323 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,821 | 69.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 77.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 77.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 50.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 4,046 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 46.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 5.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 39.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 27.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 6,714 | 61.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 72.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 100.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 100.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 20.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 100.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 58.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 100.0% |