Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Chickasaw Family Poverty
10.8%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.00002% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 33.3% |
| Range | 25.7% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 12.7% |
| Median | 7.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.2% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,634,154 | 10.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,276,031 | 9.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,585,582 | 9.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,602,588 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 820,979 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,327 | 9.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 230,949 | 11.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 248,645 | 10.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 88,684 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,369 | 12.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 9.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 10.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 54,673 | 12.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 13.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 13,199 | 14.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 14.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,441 | 16.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 13.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 10.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 8.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 5.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 18.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 9.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 12.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 13.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 4,290 | 11.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,159 | 13.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 6.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 12.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,847 | 11.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 19.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 8.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 19.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 20.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 17.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 9.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 10.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 10.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 14.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 12.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 8.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 5.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 12.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 12.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 14.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 13.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 11.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 18.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 25.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 16.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 9.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 29.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 13.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 9.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 17.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 3.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 14.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 9.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 12.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 19.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 33.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 17.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 16.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 9.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 16.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 13.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 4.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 6.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 10.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 3.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 12.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 6.6% |