Chickasaw vs Palestinian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Palestinian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Palestinians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Palestinian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,371,597 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 26.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 27.9% |
| Range | 36.7% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 12.0% |
| Median | 17.3% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |