Chickasaw vs Yup'ik Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yup'ik Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,953,157 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 35.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 80.0% |
| Range | 36.7% | 78.3% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 23.8% |
| Median | 17.3% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 3.0%), Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |