Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Male Disability
Chickasaw Male Disability
15.1%
DISABILITY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.61% in percentage of males with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of males with a disability within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of males with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Male Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 56.8% |
| Range | 36.8% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 22.9% |
| Median | 7.5% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 9.1% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Male Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,646,770 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,299,596 | 13.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,606,572 | 15.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,614,409 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 822,648 | 16.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 474,840 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 233,583 | 18.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 89,231 | 18.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,765 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 22.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 15.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 23.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 16,025 | 19.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 67,875 | 17.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,539 | 19.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 22.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 21.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 16.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 44.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 25.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 18.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 25.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 20.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 22.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 2,552 | 15.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 23.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,906 | 21.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 23.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 290 | 45.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 17.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 665 | 27.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 23.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 19.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 22.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 23.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 19.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 22.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 23.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 21.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 18.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 9.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 24.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 23.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 15.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 23.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 1,803 | 20.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 47.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 21.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 351 | 15.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 20.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 22.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 24.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 22.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 23.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 14.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 12.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 15.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 15.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 23.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 25.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 26.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 6.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 24.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 38.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 28.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 190 | 18.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 27.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 50.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 27.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 28.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 24.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 46.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05% | 114 | 30.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 32.6% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 21.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 34.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 7.6% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.79% | 106 | 56.8% |