Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty
12.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,964,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.7% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Canada influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Canada simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants from North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Canada Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.5% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 26.2% |
| Median | 9.5% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 24.2% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Canada Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 377,576,060 | 14.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 60,298,491 | 10.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 13,614,327 | 10.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 4,594,058 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 1,475,617 | 10.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 658,449 | 9.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 213,328 | 9.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 134,663 | 11.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 155,791 | 11.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 52,780 | 11.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 37,620 | 11.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 20,327 | 19.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 30,220 | 10.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.82% | 16,627 | 19.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 31,409 | 14.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 14,798 | 6.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 591 | 13.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 4,292 | 21.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 6,663 | 41.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 2,142 | 15.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 2,383 | 23.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73% | 1,277 | 3.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 53 | 38.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 5,130 | 22.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.19% | 2,854 | 28.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.95% | 502 | 17.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.30% | 188 | 97.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.25% | 723 | 21.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74% | 1,269 | 9.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 247 | 46.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 4,297 | 28.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.29% | 133 | 71.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 3,799 | 27.4% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 401 | 59.3% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 2,498 | 16.3% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 66 | 100.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.93% | 56 | 25.0% |
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.67% | 24 | 80.0% |