Shoshone Female Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Shoshone Female Poverty
16.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,694,593 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 16.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in poverty level among females.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Shoshone and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Shoshone influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Shoshone simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Bahamas (16.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (16.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Senegalese (16.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Comanche (16.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Belizeans | 61.6 /100 | #275 | Good 16.1% |
Haitians | 61.6 /100 | #276 | Good 16.1% |
West Indians | 61.4 /100 | #277 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 60.9 /100 | #278 | Good 16.3% |
Senegalese | 60.8 /100 | #279 | Good 16.3% |
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 60.6 /100 | #280 | Good 16.3% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 60.6 /100 | #281 | Good 16.3% |
Shoshone | 60.5 /100 | #282 | Good 16.3% |
Comanche | 59.8 /100 | #283 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 59.7 /100 | #284 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 59.6 /100 | #285 | Average 16.5% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 59.4 /100 | #286 | Average 16.5% |
Bangladeshis | 59.3 /100 | #287 | Average 16.5% |
Hmong | 59.3 /100 | #288 | Average 16.5% |
Immigrants from Belize | 59.2 /100 | #289 | Average 16.5% |
Shoshone Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone Data | Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.024% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 79.2% | 43.9% |
Range | 79.1% | 38.0% |
Mean | 16.2% | 21.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.3% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.9% | 10.4% |
Correlation Details
Shoshone Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 66,458,602 | 15.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 668,360 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 279,461 | 10.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 64,260 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 88,924 | 11.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 7,192 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 867 | 19.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 34,605 | 12.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 13,606 | 9.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 3,817 | 32.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 1,467 | 27.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 31,286 | 17.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 8,412 | 14.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 148 | 18.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 1,903 | 26.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 1,015 | 5.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 1,154 | 35.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.95% | 13,837 | 8.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 1,060 | 8.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.63% | 890 | 23.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.07% | 2,942 | 23.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.61% | 791 | 11.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.31% | 921 | 42.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.84% | 1,125 | 43.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 1,561 | 17.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.45% | 353 | 25.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 1,155 | 12.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 72 | 31.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.72% | 218 | 31.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.00% | 300 | 30.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.49% | 149 | 40.0% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.91% | 363 | 11.3% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.65% | 138 | 21.8% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.72% | 1,647 | 32.8% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.67% | 1,629 | 32.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 219 | 29.1% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.17% | 144 | 26.7% |