Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Tsimshian Female Poverty
13.1%
POVERTY | FEMALES
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tsimshian and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tsimshian influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Tsimshian simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 27.8% |
| Range | 75.8% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 14.0% |
| Median | 3.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.5% | 6.9% |
Correlation Details
| Tsimshian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 15,404,738 | 14.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 171,789 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 15,580 | 7.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 3,609 | 15.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 804 | 17.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,736 | 11.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 822 | 4.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 838 | 26.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 13,913 | 10.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,168 | 14.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 656 | 27.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 361 | 21.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 546 | 2.2% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.40% | 1,465 | 13.1% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.85% | 1,437 | 12.5% |