Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty
15.7%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Liberia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Immigrants from Liberia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants from Liberia Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 45.5% |
| Range | 15.3% | 42.0% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 16.9% |
| Median | 2.4% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Liberia Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 92,525,065 | 15.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 16,917,850 | 15.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 8,253,340 | 14.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 4,344,173 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 4,456,028 | 18.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 1,573,372 | 13.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 1,689,387 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 910,570 | 14.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 503,893 | 11.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 375,660 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 335,805 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 181,982 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 448,826 | 13.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 347,729 | 12.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 103,306 | 15.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 518,373 | 21.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 89,285 | 12.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 107,193 | 20.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 121,884 | 13.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 8,705 | 10.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 21,592 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 113,593 | 10.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 176,668 | 14.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 42,257 | 13.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 56,572 | 12.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 23,101 | 16.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 9,507 | 7.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 52,655 | 21.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 47,729 | 19.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 33,620 | 15.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 95,009 | 12.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 91,692 | 30.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 6,295 | 13.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 50,464 | 16.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,017 | 6.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 13,811 | 11.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 5,234 | 4.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 35,244 | 11.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 1,730 | 32.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 17,716 | 3.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 15,709 | 21.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 30,544 | 11.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 8,596 | 26.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 48,577 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 23,363 | 12.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 32,912 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 1,425 | 30.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 11,051 | 12.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27% | 14,550 | 22.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 22,337 | 14.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 21,620 | 11.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 23,804 | 22.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.14% | 84,951 | 8.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 37,169 | 11.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 32,967 | 13.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.49% | 22,493 | 32.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 13,075 | 13.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 35,780 | 29.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 28,392 | 11.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.07% | 10,682 | 39.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 3,156 | 30.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.21% | 1,658 | 45.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 2,849 | 35.8% |