Chickasaw vs Serbian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Serbian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Serbians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Serbian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,492,629 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 29.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Serbian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 32.4% |
| Range | 36.7% | 30.9% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 11.4% |
| Median | 17.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |